.
.
.
.

Mursi strikes Mubarak cronies and liberals

Mustafa Salama

Published: Updated:
Despite the western image of Egyptian’s rejection of President Mursi’s constitutional declaration, the majority of Egyptians actually support it. The declaration looks to make the revolution “immune” as the Constituent Assembly and the Shura Council become temporarily inviolable. The decision made is supposed to protect the transitional period from falling back into the hands of the deep state, push the process forward and not keep Egypt at a stand still.

On Facebook polls, the majority of participants showed support for Mursi. On “we are all Khalid Said” one of the major groups that has more than two and a half million followers and was a key fomenter of the revolution, over 70% of participants said they supported Mursi’s constitutional declaration.

This is shown in the clearly greater mobilization that was harnessed in front of the presidential palace; free of violence and sexual harassment, unlike its counterpart in Tahrir, which was full of thugs and pro-Mubarak lots.

There are those who are against Mursi whether his actions are positive or not. When Mursi failed to remove the public prosecutor the first time, there was plenty of ridiculing voices rejoicing in his failure, and celebrating any possible shortcomings of the government. Those who cried justice for the martyrs and injured are now standing in its way.

Those who called for the dissolution of parliament are now upset that legislation is in the hands of President Mursi, yet they fail to offer a logical and practical alternative, which fits revolutionary demands.

Today many “liberal” idols are hand in hand with the remnants of the old regime, failing to condemn the violence that occurred against offices of the Freedom and Justice Party as well as AlJazeera news channel. The opportunism is stark and blatant and obviously favors authoritarianism over an Islamist majority.

ElBaradei has called for the military to intervene. With no avail, he called on Washington and the EU to condemn Mursi and to cut off relations with the president till he annuls his declaration; statements that do not impress all liberals.

Western media like the Los Angeles Times are running the story in a one sided fashion. Failing to mention that those “judges” who attended the fired public prosecutors conference, were a minority in the meeting where the prosecutor gave a speech. Never mind that among those seated next to him were lawyers appointed by the old regime to defend them against accusations of killing peaceful revolutionaries. Moreover, these judges were all appointed by Mubarak, based on loyalty, not their poor legal credentials.

Never mind that the public prosecutor used to be the head judge for “National Security” in Egypt for seven years and is hinted in the LA Times to be a victim of institutionalism. “National Security,” the institutionalized mob behind the majority of human rights violations in Egypt, which includes torture, killings, rape, secret and illegal imprisonments of Mubarak’s political opposition.

Several independent judge fraternities have approved Mursi’s declaration which is only in place until the constitution is drafted and parliamentary elections take place. This is not to say that the constitutional declaration did not go without any observations. The concern revolves around the inviolability of decisions that may follow. The area of decisions need to be defined and contained in certain issues and not left open-ended which was Al-Noor’s observation, though it did not break mutual trust.

The transitional period for liberal forces is the only time where they will have a bigger influence over political landscape of Egypt; this is why many local observers suggest that they are trying to prolong it. After the constitutional drafting and elections they will witness a decline in representation based on ballot results. Furthermore, and more than ever; liberals are in a very bad position having worn out their legitimacy by associating with old regime cronies.

My hope is that liberal and secular figures will put their egos aside and not only focus on the future of Egypt and its stability; but also consider their own political future and interest in the country, which does not coincide with their current political maneuvering.

To do so they need to get back in the constitutional committee show their grievances and push for change where possible. I am personally aware of initiatives that are trying to include non-Islamist grievances in the Constituent Assembly and are serious about it.

The liberal current understands that the street is not on their side as the polls and the latest mobilization efforts indicate. They should also understand that Egypt is quickly rising as a regional star and broker of stability; it is no longer the case that external powers can intervene to further one faction over another. Liberals need to engage the political arena or will be brushed aside, further alienated and marginalize themselves.

(Mustafa Salama is a Political Researcher and a Freelance Journalist. He has an extensive academic background on Islamist movements and Middle East Affairs. This piece first appeared at Daily News Egypt on Nov. 25, 2012)
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not reflect Al Arabiya English's point-of-view.