Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood denied on Thursday holding talks with the military leadership, following a report by Reuters that the Islamist group proposed through an EU go-between a frame work for talks to resolve Egypt’s political crisis.
“There is no truth to the talk about negotiations with or without mediations between the Muslim Brotherhood and leaders of the military coup," said Jihad al-Haddad, Brotherhood spokesman.
Earlier, Reuters quoted Haddad, who represented the movement in previous EU-facilitated talks, as saying that a proposal had been made to envoy Bernardino Leon before a visit on Wednesday by EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton.
Leon confirmed to Reuters that he had offered the European Union’s “good offices” to help resolve the crisis, although he said the term “mediator” exaggerated the role.
The proposal, as described by Haddad, was still in its early stages, according to Reuters. He did not give details, described it as only a “framework” for opening a channel of dialogue, and insisted on the Brotherhood's firm demand that the July 3 “coup” that brought down Mursi be reversed.
He also said it was not clear who would represent the opposite side: the military which removed Mursi or politicians.
“We need a third side. It’s not even clear who the third side would be. Is it the army? The NSF?” he said, referring to the National Salvation Front made up of political groups that oppose Mursi.
Leon, who spoke by telephone on board his flight back to Brussels from Cairo, declined to go into details of any proposals he had received but said he believed the sides were growing more open to talks.
“It is too early to talk about initiatives. We have just listened to the parties and to what are their positions and any possible room for openness to support. We believe that this should be an ... Egyptian dialogue and no foreign actors,” Bernadino told Reuters.
“What we have been doing is explore openers, to see what is the room for starting something,” he added.
During her visit on Wednesday, Ashton met several senior Brotherhood figures as well as the interim authorities. The visit provided a notable contrast with one two days earlier by a senior U.S. envoy, who left without meeting the Brotherhood.
An aide to Mohamed ElBaradei, the NSF leader named vice president in the interim government, had no immediate comment.
First reverse the coup
Haddad said the Brotherhood would be willing to negotiate over any political issue, including new elections to replace Mursi as president, but insisted that the army would first have to reverse its decree that unilaterally removed Mursi.
“First they have to reverse the coup,” he said. “You can’t come on a tank and remove an elected leader.... It is a stand-off, it is either a military coup or a democratic choice,” he said in a midnight interview at site in Cairo of a mass vigil by thousands of protesters demanding Mursi’s return.
Leon acknowledged that the sides were far apart.
“They are both in very firm positions, both sides, but at the same time we think that they are not completely closed to the possibility of re-engaging. So, I wouldn’t say that we left Egypt optimistic, but at least I can say not pessimistic.”
Mursi and a small number other Brotherhood figures -including Haddad’s father - have been held incommunicado by the armed forces at an undisclosed location since he was toppled.
The Brotherhood has maintained its vigil near a Cairo mosque into its third week. Since Mursi’s fall, protest marches have frequently led to violence in which at least 99 people have been killed, with both sides blaming the other.
Hundreds of Mursi supporters have been rounded up and the authorities have issued arrest warrants for most of the group’s leaders. Haddad himself said he faced treason charges.
The interim government has invited the Brotherhood to participate in the transition leading to new elections, expected in about six months. The Brotherhood has dismissed those offers as propaganda.
Haddad said the authorities were determined to destroy the Islamist organization to ensure it never won elections again, a policy he said would backfire by pushing the Brotherhood underground where it survived during decades of military rule.
“They need to give the Brotherhood deep enough blows that it won’t be able to contest anything new. How do they do that? Freezing the assets, arresting the top leaders, closing down the party and the Brotherhood headquarters and offices across the country, and killing people on the street,” he said.
“And they think we are going to budge? This is an organization built for 86 years under oppressive regimes. That is the nature of the organization that is our comfort zone. They just pushed us back into it.”
Haddad said the Brotherhood could again participate in new elections but that it would be unlikely to accept them as long as the military had shown it was willing to overrule the result.
"Either we force the military’s head back into the barracks, and they have to be taught a lesson not to pop their head back into the political scene ever again, or we die trying,” he said.
Spaniard Leon acted as a go-between in secret negotiations in the first half of this year between the Brotherhood and the NSF. The Brotherhood was represented by Haddad and the NSF by figures including ElBaradei.
Those discussions, revealed by Reuters this week, failed to produce a deal in time to save Egypt’s first freely elected president. But they did establish the EU as a trusted neutral party at a time when Washington is doubted by both sides.
According to Haddad’s account, largely matching accounts from EU and NSF figures, the sides were close to agreement on three main opposition demands: a new cabinet, revisions to an electoral law and the removal of the public prosecutor.
Haddad said the main disagreement ended up being the fate of Hisham Kandil, Mursi’s prime minister. The Brotherhood had been willing to let the opposition name a replacement, but Mursi refused, arguing that the prime minister needed to come from a party with strong representation in parliament, Haddad said.
However, he also said the NSF figures on the opposite side seemed determined to avoid reaching a deal no matter what.
“If the NSF were to send the president a list of their demands, literally everything they could think of, on NSF letter headed paper, and the president were to remove the NSF letter head and put it on a presidential letterhead, and sign it and seal with a presidential seal, and issue it as a decree- they would go to the street protesting against it.”