No place for Assad in Syria talks, U.S. officials say

France says that possible talks with Assad would be a ‘scandalous gift’ to ISIS

Published: Updated:
Enable Read mode
100% Font Size

The United States insisted on Monday it would never negotiate directly with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, edging away from comments made by Secretary of State John Kerry, and it cast doubt on any immediate prospects for third-party talks to resolve Syria’s civil war.

Kerry’s apparent suggestion in a CBS television interview on Sunday that there could be a place for Assad in efforts to reach a diplomatic solution to the Syrian conflict drew swift criticism from European and Arab allies.


France said that possible talks with Assad would be a “scandalous gift” to the ISIS and Britain a day earlier sad Assad would have no place in Syria’s future.

Seeking to calm the diplomatic storm, State Department and White House officials sought to clarify Kerry’s remarks and show that Washington’s position on Assad had not softened.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said that while the United States accepted the need for representatives of Assad’s government to participate in any negotiations, “it would not be and would never be - and it wasn’t what Secretary Kerry was intending to imply - that that would be Assad himself.”

“We continue to believe ... that there’s no future for Assad in Syria,” Psaki told reporters.

Earlier Monday, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said any role for Assad would be a “scandalous gift” to ISIS.

“The solution is a political transition which would preserve regime institutions, not Mr. Bashar al-Assad. Any other solution which would keep Mr Assad in the saddle would be an absolutely scandalous, gigantic gift to Daesh,” Fabius said in Brussels, using another name for ISIS.

“The millions of Syrians who have been persecuted by Assad would transfer their support to Daesh. Obviously that must be avoided.”

The French minister said he had spoken to Kerry on Monday morning and that the top U.S. diplomat “assured me that there was absolutely nothing new in the American position on Syria.”

Washington has made clear that its top priority in Syria is the fight against ISIS militants, who have seized large swathes of the country as well as parts of Iraq.

Syria’s civil war is now into its fifth year, with hundreds of thousands killed and millions of Syrians displaced, and Assad is showing no signs of abandoning power.

“We have to negotiate in the end,” Kerry had told CBS when asked whether the United States would be willing to negotiate with Assad. “We’ve always been willing to negotiate in the context of the Geneva I process,” he added, referring to a 2012 conference that called for a negotiated transition to end the conflict.

Kerry also said the United States and other countries, which he did not name, were exploring ways to reignite the diplomatic process to end the conflict in Syria.

Psaki said the United States is having “many discussions” with the Russians – who are close allies of Assad – in addition to European and Gulf partners.

When asked whether any new diplomatic efforts were under way through third parties such as the United Nations, she said: “There’s no process underway. There’s no process that’s about to start.”

She said the United States was open to hearing more about a Russian proposal to convene new Syria talks, but added that she could not predict “an outcome that will move the ball forward.”

The United States led efforts to convene U.N.-backed peace talks in Geneva last year between the Western-backed Syrian opposition and a government delegation. The talks collapsed after two rounds. Russia convened some opposition and government figures in January but they yielded little progress and were boycotted by the main opposition coalition.

Russia on Monday invited the U.N. envoy for Syria to a second round of meetings scheduled for the beginning of April, Interfax reported.

(With AFP and Reuters)

Top Content Trending