US top court: Iran must pay $2 bn to terror victims
The US Supreme Court ruled that Iran must pay nearly $2 billion in frozen assets to victims killed in attacks blamed on Iran
The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a judgment allowing families of victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism to collect nearly $2 billion.
The court on Wednesday ruled 6-2 in favor of relatives of the 241 Marines who died in a 1983 terrorist attack in Beirut and victims of other attacks that courts have linked to Iran.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion for the court rejecting efforts by Iran’s central bank to try to stave off court orders that would allow the relatives to be paid for their losses.
Iran’s Bank Markazi complained that Congress was intruding into the business of federal courts when it passed a 2012 law that specifically directs that the banks’ assets in the United States be turned over to the families.
The law, Ginsburg wrote, “does not transgress restraints placed on Congress and the president by the Constitution.”
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented. “The authority of the political branches is sufficient; they have no need to seize ours,” Roberts wrote.
More than 1,300 people are among the relatives of the victims of the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, the 1996 terrorist bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia which killed 19 service members, and other attacks that were carried out by groups with links to Iran. The lead plaintiff is Deborah Peterson, whose brother, Lance Cpl. James C. Knipple, was killed in Beirut.
Congress has repeatedly changed the law in the past 20 years to make it easier for victims to sue over state-sponsored terrorism; federal courts have ruled for the victims. But Iran has refused to comply with the judgments, leading lawyers to hunt for Iranian assets in the United States.
Liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans in Congress, as well as the Obama administration, supported the families in the case.
The case is Bank Markazi v. Peterson, 14-770.
-
Obama’s visit to Saudi Arabia: What awaits after the Iran deal?
Experts and former US officials that Al Arabiya English interviewed to assess the visit, highlight differences between Washington and its Gulf partners Features -
US should go after Iran, not Saudi Arabia!
If the 9/11 measure goes into effect it could well be the straw that breaks the camel’s back Middle East -
US wants to help Gulf forces counter Iran
Washington is proposing to help Gulf special forces and navies to prevent Iran from supplying Shiite groups in the region Middle East -
Panorama: Jordan recalls its ambassador from Iran
News Bulletins -
US and Iran report some progress on Tehran’s sanctions complaint
After meeting for more than 2 1/2 hours behind closed doors, the ministers emerged saying they agreed to meet again Friday Middle East -
Iran’s army denies direct involvement in Syria, speaks of ‘volunteers’
Iran is Assad’s main regional ally and has provided military and economic support for his conflict with rebel groups and ISIS Middle East -
Gulf, US agree joint patrols to block Iran arms
Iran denies accusations by Gulf states that it is smuggling weapons to Yemen, where GCC countries are involved in a military campaign Middle East