Turkish opposition leaders vow to overturn sentences against Kavala, others

Published: Updated:
Read Mode
100% Font Size
6 min read

Turkish opposition leaders vowed to overturn jail sentences against philanthropist Osman Kavala and seven others convicted at the end of a case that lawyers said showed courts had become the government’s “vehicle for revenge.”

Kavala was sentenced to life in prison without parole, while seven others got 18 years based on claims they organized and financed nationwide protests in 2013, charges from which they were acquitted two years ago.

For the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

The verdict was seen as symbolic of a crackdown on dissent under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the punishment of the government’s perceived foes through the use of the judiciary.

Kemal Kilicdaroglu, leader of the Republican People’s Party (CHP), promised on Monday to reinstate the rule of law if the opposition wins elections scheduled for June 2023.

“In this fictitious trial, Osman Kavala was sentenced to life in prison in a case in which he was previously acquitted,” he said in a speech to CHP members on Tuesday.

“We will fight against those who place the judiciary under the orders of politics.... and hold our people hostage in prisons,” said Kilicdaroglu, who is seen as Erdogan’s likely challenger for the presidency.

His description of the so-called Gezi protests as “a national movement” stands in sharp contrast to Erdogan’s view that the demonstrations aimed at toppling the government.

Hundreds of thousands marched in Istanbul and elsewhere in Turkey in 2013 as demonstrations against plans to build a replica Ottoman barracks in the city’s Gezi Park grew into nationwide protests against Erdogan’s government.

The president has equated the protesters to Kurdish militants and those accused of orchestrating a failed coup in 2016. He has accused Kavala personally several times of being the financier of the protests.

But the CHP and five other opposition parties who have formed an alliance to defeat Erdogan in the next elections have sounded the alarm over the verdict.

“The members of the judiciary, who conduct the trial themselves, have abandoned their authority and ability for judgement,” said IYI Party general secretary Ugur Poyraz.

Ankara’s Western allies, opposition members and rights groups say Turkish courts are under the control of the government. Erdogan and his AK Party say they are independent.

Protests against the verdict were planned in Ankara and Istanbul later on Tuesday.

A journalist stands in front of a poster featuring jailed businessman and philanthropist Osman Kavala during a press conference of his lawyers on October 31, 2018. (AFP)
A journalist stands in front of a poster featuring jailed businessman and philanthropist Osman Kavala during a press conference of his lawyers on October 31, 2018. (AFP)

Rewriting history

The investigation that began with Kavala’s detention in Oct. 2017 has seen various turns that cast doubt over the legality of the judicial process, which critics said aimed to “rewrite history” and criminalize the Gezi protests.

The indictment in the case alleged links between George Soros and Kavala, in what lawyers said was an attempt to create the perception that the protests were funded by foreign powers.

The indictment said the fact that defendants discussed bringing milk, juice and pastries to Gezi Park, as well as gasmasks to counter the effects of tear gas, showed they were financing the protests.

Another court ruled in 2020 that the evidence, initially gathered by a group within the judiciary that Ankara accuses of orchestrating the coup, was not enough for a conviction.

Similar concerns were highlighted by one of the judges who dissented from Monday’s verdict.

The judge, one of three presiding, said the only evidence was phone taps that were collected illegally and, even if they were legal, were not enough to convict by themselves.

All defendants should be acquitted and Kavala should be released, the judge wrote in his dissenting opinion.

Veysel Ok, lawyer and co-director of Media and Law Studies Association, said Monday’s verdict was void of “judicial logic” and aimed to intimidate those seeking the rule of law.

“This ruling shows us the picture of a judiciary that has become a vehicle for revenge due to political interests. It is a sign that no one in Turkey has legal security,” he said. The verdict showed the judiciary would be used “as the fundamental weapon” to “bring the opposition to line” before the elections.

“It indicates that a much harsher period awaits us and that the public opposition and civil society need to stick together.”

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) called in Dec. 2019 for Kavala’s release, saying his detention served the purpose of silencing him.

But Kavala’s continued detention means Turkey now faces being suspended from the Council of Europe rights watchdog, after it launched rare infringement proceedings against Ankara.

Kavala was re-arrested hours after the acquittal and has remained in jail for the past two years on an espionage charge, a move seen as attempting to circumvent the ECHR ruling. Kavala was acquitted of espionage on Monday.

All defendants have always denied the charges, saying the Gezi protests were protected by constitutional rights.

Three defendants, Mucella Yapici, Can Atalay and Tayfun Kahraman, said jointly in court on Friday that the Gezi protests were not organized by a group but erupted spontaneously.

“The Gezi resistance is the most democratic, creative, egalitarian, comprehensive and peaceful mass movement in the history of this country,” they told the court.

“The only force that can lead millions of people to spill on to the street for weeks can only be people’s own will.”

Read more:

US ‘deeply troubled’ by ‘unjust’ conviction of Turkish activist Kavala: State dept

Turkey summons ambassadors of US, Germany, France over calls for releasing Kavala

Turkish opposition deepens cooperation, heaping pressure on President Erdogan

Top Content Trending