UN nuclear chief says Iran ties need to get back on track

Iran appears to be at odds with the UN nuclear watchdog over information it should be providing regarding its atomic program, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Friday.

“We don’t seem to be seeing eye-to-eye with Iran over their obligations to the IAEA,” Rafael Grossi told a conference in Rome, adding that he was concerned over a recent announcement by Tehran that it was boosting its enrichment capacity.

For the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

“We need to put our relationship back on track,” he said.

Grossi said he was “still hopeful” Teheran would give an explanation for the unexpected discovery a few years back of traces of uranium traces at three undeclared sites.

A recent IAEA report said Iran had agreed to a visit by the UN watchdog in November to start giving long-waited answers. However, the meeting has not yet happened.

The issue of the unexplained uranium particles has become an obstacle in wider talks to revive Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers since Tehran is now seeking a closure of the IAEA’s investigation as part of those negotiations, Western powers say.

Grossi said the talks appeared to have stalled. “At the moment it does not seem to have the momentum it needs to (get) back to life,” he said.

He added that he was concerned by Iran’s announcement last month that it had begun enriching uranium to 60 percent purity at its Fordow nuclear plant.

“Iran informed us they were tripling, not doubling, tripling their capacity to enrich uranium at 60 percent, which is very close to military level, which is 90 percent” he said.

“This is not banal. This is something that has consequences.

It gives them an inventory of nuclear material for which it cannot be excluded ... that there might be another use. We need to go. We need to verify,” he said.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear technology is solely for civil purposes.

Read more: US envoy: Iran not pursuing a nuclear weapon, military option still on table