Israel agrees to delay Gaza invasion so US can rush missile defenses to region: WSJ

Published: Updated:
Read Mode
100% Font Size
3 min read

Israel has agreed to delay an expected invasion of Gaza for now so that the United States can rush missile defenses to the region to protect US troops there, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing US and Israeli officials.

US officials have so far persuaded Israel to hold off until US air-defense systems can be placed in the region, as early as later this week, the WSJ said.

Israel is also taking into account in its planning the effort to supply humanitarian aid inside Gaza, as well as diplomatic efforts to free hostages held by Hamas militants, the news report said.

For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

Threats to the US troops were of paramount concern, it said.

Washington was scrambling to deploy nearly a dozen air defense systems, including for its troops serving in Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria and the United Arab Emirates, the Journal said.

The US military and other officials believe their forces will be targeted by militant groups once Israel launches its ground invasion of the Hamas-ruled Palestinian territory, according to the report.

Reuters reported on Monday that Washington advised Israel to hold off on a ground assault in the Gaza Strip and is keeping Qatar - a broker with the Palestinian militants - apprised of those talks as its tries to free more hostages and prepare for a possible wider regional war.

Last week Reuters reported the Pentagon planned to send two Iron Dome missile defense systems to Israel to help it defend itself against inbound missiles, and a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system and additional Patriot air defense missile system battalions to the Middle East.

Read more:

Israel aims fire at southern Gaza as world leaders seek pause in fighting

Iran’s Khamenei accuses US of complicity in Israeli ‘crimes’ in Gaza

Turkey’s Erdogan says Hamas is a ‘liberation’ not a ‘terrorist’ group

Top Content Trending