U.S. appeals court rules NSA bulk data sweep illegal
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union against the NSA and FBI
A U.S. appeals court ruled Thursday that the National Security Agency’s massive collection of phone records of Americans is illegal, saying it exceeds the scope of what Congress authorized.
The laws used as a basis for the bulk data collection “have never been interpreted to authorize anything approaching the breadth of the sweeping surveillance at issue here,” said the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a 97-page opinion.
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union against the NSA and FBI, following disclosures about the vast surveillance programs in documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
The “metadata” collected from millions of phone calls includes the numbers called, times and other information but not the content of conversations. Still, civil liberties advocates argue the program is a massive intrusion on privacy with only minimal help in the anti-terrorism effort.
The court stopped short of ruling on the constitutional issues of the bulk collection of phone metadata, but said the government went far beyond what Congress intended in Section 215 of the Patriot Act, a law aimed at allowing authorities to thwart terrorism.
“There is no evidence that Congress intended for those statutes to authorize the bulk collection of every American’s toll billing or educational records and to aggregate them into a database,” the appellate panel said in the opinion.
“The interpretation that the government asks us to adopt defies any limiting principle. If the government is correct, it could use (Section) 215 to collect and store in bulk any other existing metadata available anywhere in the private sector, including metadata associated with financial records, medical records, and electronic communications (including email and social media information) relating to all Americans.”
The court declined to issue an injunction to halt the program, saying it would make little sense since the law is set to expire on June 1.
Lawmakers are currently debating whether to reform the law or extend it.
The court said that “in light of the asserted national security interests at stake, we deem it prudent to pause to allow an opportunity for debate in Congress that may (or may not) profoundly alter the legal landscape.”
NSA chief says agency complies with ‘law’ after spyware reportsRogers was responding to reports that the NSA had embedded spyware on computer hard drives Digital
Journalist Glenn Greenwald says he fears arrest in UKReporter who covered Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations says he won’t visit UK because he ‘doesn’t trust’ the authorities Print
U.S. unveils 6-year-old report on NSA surveillanceThe Office of the Director of National Intelligence publicly released the redacted report on Saturday World News
Kerry to Snowden: ‘Man up’ and come homeThe former NSA contract systems analyst is living in Russia on a temporary grant of asylum World News
Post, Guardian share Pulitzers for NSA revelationsThe awards, American journalism's highest honor, were announced Monday Digital
Obama to propose ending NSA phone sweepObama has grappled with surveillance programs since classified details were leaked by Edward Snowden World News
Is the NSA using ‘Angry Birds’ to spy on you?Dozens of classified documents detail the NSA and GCHQ efforts to piggyback on this commercial data collection for their own purposes Variety
Washington wonders where to keep NSA dataKey U.S. lawmakers have expressed concerns that the information would not be readily available to the officials who need it if held by non-governmental entities Features
Obama: spying essential for national securityThe president says the collection of billions of data records by the NSA would go on to protect America World News
Report: NSA scoops up millions of text messages a dayThe latest revelations from Edward Snowden files say NSA collected text messages from around the world World News