.
.
.
.

Facebook has no plans to lift ban on Trump accounts, says Sandberg

Published: Updated:

Facebook Inc’s operations chief Sheryl Sandberg said on Monday the world’s largest social network had no plans to lift its block on the accounts of US President Donald Trump, as the company clamped down on a phrase that has become a rallying cry for the president’s supporters.

For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app

Sandberg, speaking during the Reuters Next conference, said she was glad that Facebook had frozen Trump’s accounts, which came as tech giants scrambled to crack down on his baseless claims about fraud in the US presidential election amid riots in Washington last week.

Read more:

Twitter conspiring ‘to silence me,’ Trump says after Twitter deletes @POTUS tweets

Twitter shares slump 8 percent after US President Trump account suspension

Germany’s Merkel deems Trump’s Twitter ban ‘problematic’


Hours later, the company banned the phrase “stop the steal” altogether, citing use of the term to organize events contesting the outcome of the US presidential election that have a propensity for violence.

Supporters of President Donald Trump gather outside of the Wyndham Gettysburg hotel prior to a Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee public hearing to discuss 2020 election issues and irregularities with President Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani on November 25, 2020 in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. (AFP)
Supporters of President Donald Trump gather outside of the Wyndham Gettysburg hotel prior to a Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee public hearing to discuss 2020 election issues and irregularities with President Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani on November 25, 2020 in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. (AFP)



If Trump wanted to appeal the removal of his content, that could happen through the company’s new Oversight Board, she added. Facebook said Trump could not appeal the actual suspension through the board.

“This shows the president is not above the policies we have,” Sandberg said, speaking with Reuters Breakingviews columnist Gina Chon.

Facebook executives have long taken a light touch to policing speech posted by politicians, maintaining that people have a right to see statements from their leaders.

The company backed down somewhat on that position and started applying labels to the president’s posts after facing a backlash this summer, including an advertiser boycott, when it declined to act against Trump’s incendiary rhetoric around anti-racism protests throughout the United States.

It reversed course and banned Trump indefinitely following last week’s riots, which culminated in the storming of the US Capitol.

Facebook’s stock closed down 4 percent on Monday, as social networks’ moves against Trump spurred concern among investors over future regulation. Twitter, which permanently suspended Trump, tumbled over 6 percent while Alphabet lost 2 percent.

Violent rhetoric on social media platforms including Facebook had ramped up in the weeks preceding the rallies as groups planned openly for the gatherings, according to researchers and public postings, prompting criticism of the companies for failing to take action in advance.

File phpoto of Facebook Inc’s operations chief Sheryl Sandberg. (Reuters)
File phpoto of Facebook Inc’s operations chief Sheryl Sandberg. (Reuters)



Sandberg acknowledged that Facebook may have missed some of those posts but said she believed the events were largely organized on other platforms.

She said the company was keeping an eye on further possible armed protests being planned for Washington, D.C. and at all 50 US state capital cities in the run-up to President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration on January 20, which has prompted an FBI warning.

Asked why Facebook had not taken comparable action against other leaders like Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and President Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, who likewise have been accused of inciting violence online, Sandberg said the company’s policies would apply globally.

Sandberg said regulatory pressure on US tech companies around antitrust issues was “very real,” cautioning similar scrutiny two decades ago was a “major distraction” for Microsoft Corp and caused it to miss the next phase of technology development.

“We know that history, and we have to both work on these serious issues, work with the government, work on reforming the rules that govern us -- which need to be reformed -- and keep innovating,” she said.