On Oct. 12, 2013, tens of thousands of Yemenis took to the streets of Aden in the south of the country, mostly demanding secession from the north. The date is significant, for it marks the 1967 independence of South Yemen, ending several decades of British colonialism. But for nearly five decades since then, Yemen is yet to find political stability, a semblance of economic prosperity, and, most importantly, settle the question of its national identity.
It has been two years and nine months since a large protest has occurred in the Yemeni capital. Sanaa initiated what was quickly named the Yemeni revolution and ignited a media frenzy that Yemen had officially joined the so-called Arab Spring. Seeing Yemen as a member of the “Arab Spring” club, as opposed to appreciating the Arab country’s own unique historical and political circumstances, was a media shortcut that failed to explain the vast majority of events that followed the Yemeni youth’ early protests on Jan. 27, 2011.
One of the most significant dates of the massive protests against the 33-year rule of now deposed President Ali Abdullah Saleh and his family’s strong hold over state institutions came on Feb. 3, 2012. It was then that both Sanaa and Aden stood united under one banner. It was a momentous day because both cities once served as capitals of two warring countries. The youth of Yemen were able to fleetingly bridge a gap that neither politicians nor army generals managed to close despite several agreements and years of bloody conflicts. But that collective triumph of the Yemeni people was only felt on the streets of the country, overwhelmed by poverty and destitution but also compelled by hope.
That sentiment was never truly translated to a clear political victory, even after Saleh was deposed in February 2012.
Since then, a National Dialogue Conference (NDC) was convened with representatives from various political parties, major tribes, youth movements and delegates representing the south and north. Its job was to usher in the process of drafting a constitution by organizing a referendum and general elections. Sept. 18, 2013 was recognized as a deadline for these major tasks to be accomplished, but that date slipped by. Even worse, deep divisions began showing between all parties involved. Initially, the dialogue attempted to explore commonalities between delegates representing the ruling General People’s Congress (GPC) and the Joint Meeting Parties (JMP) representing the opposition.
Even if such an accord is ever signed, the National Dialogue Conference cannot enforce any agreement that lacks a clear mandate and popular approvalRamzy Baroud
However, conflict soon ensued between members of the JMP themselves.
JMP is made of several opposition parties, including the conservative Yemeni Congregation for Reform (Islah) whose core supporters are based in the north, and the secularist Yemeni Socialist Party (YSP), based in the south. These two parties hail from entirely different ideological schools of thought, and were not always united by their wish to defeat Saleh’s ruling GPC. There was a time in which the Islah, seen as Yemen’s branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, allied with Saleh to defeat socialists.
Back then, today’s Republic of Yemen was two different countries: A Marxist-Leninist South Yemen and North Yemen. After years of conflict in which both sides used channeled regional rivalries and an international Cold War, they became united on May 22, 1990. Soon after the union, a process of democratization, elections, wealth sharing and more was initiated, but quickly fell apart. Southern leaders began speaking of a conspiracy to deprive their less populated, yet wealthier southern and eastern parts of the country of its resources by the tribal-dominated north.
In 1994, political conflict quickly descended into civil war in which the south was defeated and thousands of its leaders and military men fled. Efforts at reconciliation fell short. The sense of injustice that southerners continue to feel toward the dominant north is a notion that is challenged by many. But it is real and has never been seriously discussed, let alone resolved through a transparent political medium overseen by a democratic leadership.
The current Yemeni Socialist Party is composed of remnants of the dissolved leadership of South Yemen. Although the Yemeni revolt of January 2011 ignited much national fervor throughout the country, talks of succession began resurfacing later on, when Yemenis, especially in the south, began losing faith in the political transition and the National Dialogue Conference. Another contributing factor is the state of utter security chaos experienced throughout Yemen, some of which is al-Qaeda-led or inspired violence, much of which targets southern towns and activists. Some in the south accuse Sanaa of facilitating or allowing such violence to perpetuate to achieve political ends.
Moreover, JMP, which was slated as the united front of the opposition, became a major source of tension for the socialists deeply mistrust the Islah and the latter, which strongly objects to any division of the country, is equally suspicious of its supposed political ally. When the Egyptian military overthrew President Mohammad Mursi, Islah’s supporters protested in fury, while the socialists celebrated with utter delight. Trust, indeed, was at an all-time low.
Not that the south is united, for the Southern Movement Hiraak, which advocates a two-state federalism followed by a referendum on the future of the south, is marred by division. Hiraak is composed of many political parties and factions and is torn by competing leaderships. That division was displayed on Oct. 12 during the marking of South Yemen’s independence. Some participating factions carried pictures of Egyptian military general, Abdul Fattah al-Sissi, who overthrew Mursi, while others waved flags of Lebanon’s Hezbollah. The political divide soon erupted in bloody clashes in Parade Square, in central Aden, where some were reportedly injured.
Issues to address
On Oct. 8, only a few days prior to the Aden rallies, President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, who was installed following the ouster of Saleh, declared the country’s national dialogue was about to bear a long anticipated result. In fact, it was only “a few days away” from establishing a “united and federal Yemen,” language so carefully used as to sway both sides of the divide. But his anticipated breakthrough seemed irrelevant in the face of compellingly discouraging facts - among them the boycott of talks by factions affiliated with the Southern Movement.
Also, the signing of any accord “has been put off as the two representatives of Saleh’s General People’s Congress walked out and the GPC suspended its participation, rejecting any bid to ‘harm the unity of the homeland’,” reported Arab News.
Even if such an accord is ever signed, the National Dialogue Conference cannot enforce any agreement that lacks a clear mandate and popular approval. Uniting a “homeland” around similar ideas whilst a rebellion continues to brew in the north, a secessionist movement gathers steam in the south, an unending U.S. drone war carries on, rampant militancy moves ahead and punishing poverty thrives throughout the country, is no easy task. We must ask if under these circumstances, it is even possible at all.
Palestinian-American journalist, author, editor, Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) taught Mass Communication at Australia's Curtin University of Technology, and is Editor-in-Chief of the Palestine Chronicle. Baroud's work has been published in hundreds of newspapers and journals worldwide and his books “His books “Searching Jenin: Eyewitness Accounts of the Israeli Invasion” and “The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People’s Struggle” have received international recognition. Baroud’s third book, “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold Story” narrates the story of the life of his family, used as a representation of millions of Palestinians in Diaspora, starting in the early 1940’s until the present time.