When Israeli Prime Minister left the Mossad facility in Tel Aviv after he spent half a day there listening to analysis about the situation in the region, the accompanying persons spoke to the media about their impressions that the Syrian arena is in a state of collapse, especially that many of Assad regime’s soldiers had fled and are in a very bad situation. They said that if Israel wanted to occupy Damascus now it would only need a few hours; before the revolution they had estimated that it would take them several days.
I believe that it will not be that easy to occupy the Syrian capital. It’s not that Damascus was weaker under the rule of Bashar al-Assad or his father, or that it is still as strong as before, but it will be very difficult for anyone to enter Damascus because the occupation of the Syrian capital today is more costly than yesterday. There was an established order, which had handled the ties between Tel Aviv, Damascus and their neighbors, such as Lebanon.
The regime that had managed the ties between Israel, Syria and Hezbollah is gradually breaking down; the situation has become more dangerous now than it was in the past four decades, unlike what the Israelis are saying. What will impede Israeli tanks from occupying Damascus are not the rebel forces or the Syrian regime’s militia allies, but it is rather the chaos that would make the Israelis think long before they get bogged down in the Syrian situation. Israel will certainly not be venturing into sending its troops to cross the borders of the Golan Heights to the east.
I visited the Syrian front more than a decade ago and I saw the buffer zone separating Syria from Israel, monitored by international forces; there was a safe and unhindered access from and to the Syrian capital Damascus. At the beginning of Bashar Assad’s reign, he was suggesting that he intends to take part in a peace plan to end the conflict. The road leading to the Golan Heights was constructed and resurfaced again, and a light system was installed; there was no military aspects all along the road that we have traveled in about forty minutes heading to the outskirts of the capital, which is around 70 km long.
The road has never actually undergone a military test by the Israelis because both Assad’s regimes (the father and the son) have never dared to provoke Israel, which in turn did not demonstrate its powers during the conflicts that had erupted; Lebanon was the arena where Syria and Israel agreed to settle their scores. It was in favor of both Assad’s regime and Israel.
The relations which Israel and the Syrian Government shared were proven to be successful for a long time, except for the short period during which the 1973 war broke out, which did not change much in the balance of power. Assad’s operations have never crossed the borders of the Golan Heights; he extended his influence over Lebanon and protected Israel in Lebanon and Syria to prevent more than seven hundred thousand Palestinian refugees from becoming a security problem.
With the fall of Assad’s regime, Israel’s problem will worsen because it will lose the “allied-enemy power” in Syria and will not be able to rely on Hezbollah to control the situation in Lebanon, because in the absence of Bashar Assad, the party will be weak, besieged, and will surely be in conflict with the rest of the Lebanese militias. Moreover, there is no central authority for the army in Lebanon that can replace Assad's forces and Hezbollah.
Despite the inevitability of Assad’s collapse and the post-Assad vacuum, we cannot anticipate the events in this troubled region in the coming few years. What is certain is that the establishment of a security structure handling this geographic triangle and working as a balance to control the fabricated conflicts and inconsistent alliances like Assad used to do, seems far-fetched.
The conflict between Iran and Syria against Israel was real, but the actual reason behind it was not just the Palestinian cause, but a series of other issues, most notably the struggle for influence on the regional and strategic security levels, in addition to Iran's desire to impose itself as a dominant force through using Hezbollah, Syria and Hamas, and through the development of its nuclear power. Iran has used the Palestinian cause and its apparatuses to reach what we are witnessing today: recognizing Iran as an influential regional power.
Therefore, if Iran signs an interim nuclear deal in Geneva, we won’t be witnessing an Iranian firm stance against Israel anymore. As a result, the Iranians might also abandon Hamas and Hezbollah later on.
It is impossible to predict what will happen afterwards and who will fill the void, but one thing is sure: Israel will not be able to rest peacefully as long as it refuses the peaceful resolution to establish an independent Palestinian state on the occupied territories. The nuclear deal with Iran will not change much in a case involving five million refugees and a land occupied by force.
Abdulrahman al-Rashed is the General Manager of Al Arabiya News Channel. A veteran and internationally acclaimed journalist, he is a former editor-in-chief of the London-based leading Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat, where he still regularly writes a political column. He has also served as the editor of Asharq al-Awsat’s sister publication, al-Majalla. Throughout his career, Rashed has interviewed several world leaders, with his articles garnering worldwide recognition, and he has successfully led Al Arabiya to the highly regarded, thriving and influential position it is in today.
- Israel jails six Arabs over 2005 killing of Jewish gunman
- In Israel, an Arab village builds mosque with Chechen help
- Israel struggling to win friends, influence people
- 1800GMT: Iran blames Israel for Beirut blasts
- Israel, Iran and a not so splendid sense of isolation
- Rowhani: Israel isolated after Geneva deal
- 1800GMT: Israel dubs Iran nuclear deal as ‘historic mistake,’ others hail accord
- Israel approves West Bank settlement expansion
- Obama seeks to reassure Netanyahu on Iran nuclear deal
- Iran deal leaves Israel few options
- Israel goes ‘nuclear’ over Iran deal