When domestic violence strikes in Saudi Arabia
Women who stay home will not necessarily be safe from abuse
When commenting on a piece of news stating that young harassers have been detained in Saudi Arabia, an official said the relevant authorities will investigate harassment cases and will not rush at making judgments because sometimes girls are to blame for being harassed.
According to him, nail polish can seduce men and can be interpreted as a call to be harassed; therefore any girl who exposes her eyes or face or wears her abaya in an unusual style or goes out with her colleagues to have lunch near her workplace - like what happened with the Khobar girls - must blame themselves for being harassed by men. This understanding of violence was confirmed by a statement made by head of the court of appeal as he said that women leaving their homes to go to the market or to work is one of the reasons behind abusing her. But this does not mean that women who stay home will be safe from abuse.
The Protection from Abuse department confirmed in a statement that it cannot respond to the requests made by women abused in their homes after 10:00 p.m. Meaning, even women who stay home are not safe from abuse. If women are abused at home after 10 p.m., the social affairs ministry cannot protect them and cannot force men who abuse their wives or children from abstaining to resort to violence after 10 p.m.
Following all these “official” statements, we understand that violence against women is justified according to men’s mood. So if a man runs into a girl whose nails are polished or who’s wearing eye make-up, he’s the one to decide whether she deserves to be abused or not?
Timing is also important when it comes to this issue as the situation is different between women who leave their houses in the evening and women who leave their houses in the morning. But there are even different opinions regarding this. For example, if a girl goes out with her friends to the mall for lunch and men happened to pass by, then the girls deserve to be abused. But according to the head of the court of appeal, leaving the house in the first place justifies abuse against women. For some policemen, if a man abuses his wife, then he’s disciplining her.
If a man runs into a girl whose nails are polished or who’s wearing eye make-up, he’s the one to decide whether she deserves to be abused or not?Badria al-Bishr
The paradox which always crosses my mind is this. When a wife reports her husband to the police because he beat her up, the police tells her it’s a family problem and not a legal one. But if she goes to her brother for help and if the latter beats up her husband, the police intervenes and considers the incident as a felony.
In other words, when two men fight, regardless of kinship, it’s considered a harmful act banned by law. But if this violent act is practiced against a woman, the issue becomes as philosophical as that of what came first, the chicken or the egg. Don’t be surprised that a girl is also held responsible if she’s raped.
Not holding a man responsible for his acts does not only harm the girl but also harms him. We must be responsible for our actions regardless of what incites us to commit them. God places men and women on the same level of responsibility. You don’t kill because you found a shop that sells knives and you don’t steal because the guard was asleep.
What’s strange is that this Saudi young man who considers that women’s eye make-up or nail polish are seductive in his country is not the same man when he sees semi-naked women in other countries. He knows very well that harassing women is not his personal option. We’ve served men because we spared them a moral and intellectual struggle whenever they see a girl as they no longer ask themselves whether they should harass her or not.
Implementing laws of preventing violence against women does not only save women but men too. Since our judiciary and officials prioritize men’s interests over women’s interests, then act upon this basis, protect men and prevent them from harassing women as we don’t want their (men’s) future to go to waste.
This article was first published in al-Hayat on Dec. 2, 2013.
Dr. Badria al-Bishr is a multi-award-winning Saudi columnist and novelist. A PhD graduate from the American University of Beirut, and an alumnus of the U.S. State Department International Visitor program. Her columns put emphasis on women and social issues in Saudi Arabia. She currently lectures at King Saud University’s Department of Social Studies. Twitter: @BadryahAlbeshr
- Why Saudi Arabia should fear Iran
- Official: Egypt delays IMF loan decision, Gulf aid helps reform
- 50,000 illegal Ethiopian workers in Saudi Arabia sent home
- Saudi Arabia hints OPEC oil output limit won’t change
- Iran wants stronger ties with Saudi Arabia
- Who is better off in Saudi Arabia, an expat or a Saudi woman?
- MERS virus found in camels in Qatar, linked to human spread
- GE signs nearly $700m turbine supply deal with Saudi Arabia
- 1300GMT: Victims of floods in Saudi Arabia reach 14
- Saudi Juliet demands right to marry her Yemeni Romeo