Diplomacy, timing and Palestine
Time is one of the most crucial elements of effective diplomacy
Time is one of the most crucial elements of effective diplomacy.
A diplomatic act can have disastrous consequences if executed at the wrong time, but can be successful if the timing is correct.
Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki was quoted Tuesday as saying Palestinians are willing to postpone submitting a resolution to the U.N. Security Council Wednesday for a few days, though no later than the end of the month.
The resolution is to be submitted by the Arab state currently holding a seat at the Security Council, Jordan. It will call for a time a two-year limit within which the 1967 Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands will end.
It is high time that this occupation and the ugliness of the accompanying colonial settlement enterprise be reversedDaoud Kuttab
The Palestinian tactic is to combine Jordan’s presence at the Security Council in 2014 with the changes expected in the council in 2015.
Chances of a resolution
The chances of a resolution for Palestinian statehood gaining nine positive votes in 2015 are better because a number of new countries that will become members recognized Palestine or had their parliaments (such as Spain) recognize the state of Palestine.
The internal workings of the U.N. allow for a draft resolution to be submitted and discussed at the council, but the text to be voted on is the one that will be submitted in blue.
Gaining nine votes will force reluctant permanent members like the U.S. to take a decisive decision.
In the past, a U.S. veto was almost automatic. But recently, Israeli officials stated that they are worried that the veto is not a sure thing.
Not only are Washington and Tel Aviv at loggerheads on a variety of issues, but the U.S. is careful not to cause damage to its current anti-Islamic State Arab coalition by voting against a resolution on Palestine.
Pushing for a vote on a time ceiling at the U.N. Security Council has forced more movement in European and American capitals than in years past.
The EU is planning to pass its own resolution and tough bargaining is going on in Brussels to try to reach an acceptable text that will allow Palestinians to forego the Security Council and thus the possibility of a U.S. veto.
France has also been active trying to suggest an international conference that will tackle directly the issues at hand.
Palestinians have other options if the U.S. does carry out the threat made this week by Secretary of State John Kerry that it will veto the Security Council resolution.
The Palestinian leadership said it is ready to apply for full membership to some 520 U.N. and international bodies, including the International Court of Justice in The Hague. The latter could eventually investigate Israeli war crimes in Palestine.
While Palestinians are trying to fine-tune the best timing to use Jordan’s membership and, at the same time, avoid the current setup where the nine votes are elusive, a different timing issue exists on the Israeli side.
The decision to dissolve the Israeli Knesset and to hold early elections in March means that it will be difficult to obtain any major decision from the caretaker Israeli government.
The Palestinian resolution to set a two-year time limit means that no specific decision is required at the current time of Israel.
However, if such a resolution passes in the Security Council, this will leave its mark on the Israeli elections.
A positive vote at the Security Council on Palestinian statehood will no doubt be seen as a setback to Netanyahu and his rightwing camp.
Playing the blame game
Israelis will likely blame their current prime minister who has failed to mend relations with Washington and President Barack Obama, and will likely vote accordingly.
At the same time, if the U.S. does carry out its threat to veto the Security Council resolution, this will be seen as a vindication of Netanyahu’s tough tactics and his often repeated claim that he knows how to manage Israel’s American ally.
In June 1967, Israeli troops occupied Palestinian and Arab lands in a war that lasted only six days. At the time, the U.N. Security Council declared the “inadmissibility of acquisition of land by war”.
Forty seven years later, the same U.N. body is scheduled to discuss and vote on a resolution putting a two-year time frame for when Israel will exit the occupied territory.
It is high time that this occupation and the ugliness of the accompanying colonial settlement enterprise be reversed.
It is time to vote for peace and justice in Palestine.
This article was first published in the Jordan Times on December 18, 2014.
Daoud Kuttab, an award winning Palestinian journalist who resides in Jerusalem and Amman. Mr. Kuttab is the director general of Community Media Network a media NGO that runs a radio station in Amman (al balad radio 92.4fm) a newsweb site ammannet.net and a TV production operation in Palestine Penmedia (penmedia.ps) which is producing the Palestinian version of Sesame street. You can read his blogs on DaoudKuttab.com and find him on Twitter @DaoudKuttab.
- Israel police detain eight anti-Arab extremists
- Jordan Islamists threaten legal action over Israel gas deal
- Egypt says it backs Palestinian U.N. resolution
- Israel launches first Gaza strikes since 50-day war
- Israel relaxes travel restrictions for Palestinian Christians
- Israeli military says Gaza rocket hits Israel