The fallacy, hype and oversimplification of Iran elections

Iran’s parliament have always been looking for the supreme leader’s approval or disapproval in order to pass or reject significant bills

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
Published: Updated:
Read Mode
100% Font Size
7 min read

The media, primarily the Western mainstream outlets, have been carried away with their characterization of Iran’s elections. Vital, crucial, the most significant, dynamic, critical, and decisive are some example of words being used to characterize Iran’s elections for the parliament (Majlis) and the Assembly of Experts.

Depicting the outcome of the current Iranian elections as the dominant and controlling factor in shaping and determining Iran’s leadership, domestic and foreign policies, not only fails to grasp the complexities and nuances of Iran’s social, political, and economic establishments, but also point to the predominant misconceptions, oversimplifications, hype and lack of knowledge about Iran.

The Assembly of Experts consists of 86 clerics who are elected by the people. Nevertheless, before anyone is permitted to run, they are vetted by the hardline organization; the Council of Guardians. The 12 members of Guardian Council, are appointed directly (six members) and indirectly (nominated by the head of Judiciary) which, in return, is appointed by the supreme leader.

Without a doubt, the 12 members of the Guardian Council owe their position to the supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, represent the agenda of Khamenei, and disqualify any one whose viewpoints are not in alignment with Khamenei. For example, the Guardian Council even banned the grandson of the founder of the Islamic Republic, Hossein Khomeini, from running for a seat in the Assembly of Experts.

Furthermore, the responsibility of the Assembly of Experts is to appoint Iran’s supreme leader. In other words, for the last 28 years this political body has been sitting idly by waiting for the time that Khamenei dies. But the question is, do they really appoint the next supreme leader?

In the last 35 years, Iran’s parliament have always been looking for the supreme leader’s approval or disapproval in order to pass or reject significant bills.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh

When Khamenei came to power, he sidelined the powerful clerics who had a high level of religious authority. The Guardian Council, Khamenei’s political tool, allows low level hard line clergy who have shown their loyalty to Khamenei, and the senior cadre of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps to run for the Assembly of Experts. The 86 members, which owe their position and salary to Khamenei, have never questioned him.

The only time that the Assembly of Experts had to appoint a Supreme Leader was in 1989 when Khomeini died. According to Rafsanjani’s writings, it took the 86 members only couple of hours to appoint Khamenei.

But Khamenei was being prepared by IRGC leaders and Khomeinei to become the next supreme leader long before this, after they removed Ayatollah Hoosein Ali Montazeri, the designated successor, because he had a falling-out with Khomenei and because he criticized the Islamic Republic for marrying religion with politics. Since Khamenei was not a "marja", the IRGC even removed an article in the constitution which requires the Supreme Leader to be"marja".

The Assembly of Experts approved Khamenei because he was already picked by IRGC and Khomenei. When Khamenei dies, the next supreme leader will also be the one who is chosen by the leaders of Revolutionary Guards.

Elections for the Majlis

In the last 35 years, Iran’s parliament have always been looking for the supreme leader’s approval or disapproval in order to pass or reject significant bills, linked to the nuclear deal, assisting Syria financially, the military budget, etc.
For instance, although the current parliament is controlled by the hardliners, they did not create a problem for Iran’s President, Rowhani (the moderate) regarding the nuclear deal. They passed it because that’s what the Supreme Leader and IRGC leaders wanted in order to get economic relief. In fact, even before Rowhani became president, Khamenei and IRGC leaders were preparing the political establishment to make a deal with the West for removal of economic sanctions.

In addition, candidates for parliament also have to be approved by the Guardian Council beforehand. But even when the Guardian Council made a mistake in Khatami’s era and allowed the reformists to run and control the parliament, the reformists were immediately constrained by the IRGC forces; their newspapers were shut, and many of the members were imprisoned when they indicated that they might not align with the IRGC and supreme leader’s agenda.

In closing, analysis of Iran’s elections for the parliament (Majlis) and the Assembly of Experts have been subject to political polemics, misconceptions, oversimplifications, hype, lack of knowledge, and less than scholarly work. It is crucial to look beyond the surface and realize that when it comes to major decisions such as choosing the next leaders, or the nuclear deal, etc, the IRGC- the military empire, and Khamenei, have control over political and economic life of Iran, and make the decisions.

The IRGC which was created by Khomeini and empowered by Khamenei, have indeed evolved to be the father and major decision maker of the Islamic Republic.


Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, an Iranian-American political scientist and Harvard University scholar, is president of the International American Council. Rafizadeh serves on the board of Harvard International Review at Harvard University. He is also a member of the Gulf project at Columbia University. Rafizadeh served as a senior fellow at Nonviolence International Organization based in Washington DC. He has been a recipient of several scholarships and fellowship including from Oxford University, Annenberg University, University of California Santa Barbara, and Fulbright Teaching program. He served as ambassador for the National Iranian-American Council based in Washington DC, conducted research at Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and taught at University of California Santa Barbara through Fulbright Teaching Scholarship. He can be reached at [email protected].

Dr. Rafizadeh is a regular political analyst and contributor for national and international outlets including CNN, BBC TV and radio, ABC, Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, RT, CCTV and Aljazeera English. He is frequently quoted in major news outlets including CNN, BBC, Aljazeera and he regularly writes for both academic and non-academic papers such as New York Times International, Foreign Policy, Aljazeera, Los Angeles Times, The Nation, The Atlantic, Newsweek, Yale Journal of International Affairs, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, George Washington International Review, to name a few.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not reflect Al Arabiya English's point-of-view.
Top Content Trending