World united in decrying JASTA, warn of ‘legal’ implications on all states
Passing JASTA will give the opportunity for citizens around the world to sue many other sovereign nations, including the US itself
Here are some international reactions after Congress overrode US President Barack Obama’s veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA). If passed, JASTA would allow US citizens to sue Saudi Arabia over the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Passing the law will also give the opportunity for citizens around the world to sue many other sovereign nations, including the United States itself, eroding the principle of sovereign immunity.
1- US President Barack Obama dubbed it as a “mistake” and “basically a political vote.”
He said: “I understand why it happened. Obviously, all of us still carry the scars and trauma of 9/11 - nobody more than this 9/11 generation that has fought on our behalf of the country in the aftermath of 9/11.”
2- A White House official said JASTA was “embarrassing.”
“I would venture to say that this is the single most embarrassing thing that the United States Senate has done, possibly, since 1983,” Obama spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters aboard Air Force One. In that year, the Senate overrode President Ronald Reagan’s veto of a land bill to give a few acres to six retired couples who paid for it, but later learned that it was still government property because of a surveying error.
3- CIA Director John Brennan warned that JASTA will have grave implications for the national security of the United States.
“The principle of sovereign immunity protects US officials every day, and is rooted in reciprocity,” he said. “If we fail to uphold this standard for other countries, we place our own nation’s officials in danger.”
He said: “No country has more to lose from undermining that principle than the United States—and few institutions would be at greater risk than the CIA.”
4- White House Speaker Paul Ryan acknowledged Obama’s concerns that the bill could subject US service members to lawsuits in foreign courts.
“So I’d like to think that there’s a way we could fix it so that our service members do not have legal problems overseas, while still protecting the rights of the 9/11 victims,” Ryan told reporters.
5- Russia: US again showed disregard to international law
“Washington has once again demonstrated total disregard for international law, legalizing the possibility of filing lawsuits in US courts against states suspected of supporting terrorism,” the Foreign Ministry’s Information and Press Department said in a statement, as cited by RIA Novosti.
“The United States, where many politicians have come to believe in their own ‘uniqueness,’ insistently continues along the line of extending its jurisdiction to the entire world, disregarding the notions of state sovereignty and common sense,” the statement added.
6- France: JASTA violates international law
In Paris, French authorities have reiterated their rejection to JASTA, which the Foreign Ministry said violates international law. The Foreign Ministry Spokesman Romain Nadal said France and European countries consider JASTA as contravening international law.
Nadal also said that France, which is fighting militants along with its partners, including the United States, said this battle “should be waged through the respect of national and international laws.”
7- French Parliamentarian Pierre Lellouche
He warned that JASTA would “cause a legal revolution in international law with major political consequences.” He said one of those consequences would be French citizens allowed to sue the United States.
8- EU criticizes JASTA
An EU spokesperson said : “We do not believe the approach set out in JASTA is in the interest of either the EU or US, and it would be in conflict with the fundamental principles of international law and, in particular, the principle of state sovereign immunity.”
9- The Dutch parliament said JASTA is a “gross and unwarranted breach of Dutch sovereignty.”
10- Bahrain’s foreign minister, Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmed, tweeted: “Are there no rational people among you?”
He said the law “is an arrow launched by the US Congress at its own country.”
Ahmed Abu Zaid, spokesman for Egypt’s Foreign Ministry warned that JASTA could have a dire effect on international relations.
Chinese state entities argue they have ‘sovereign immunity’ in US courtsSome Chinese state-owned entities have adopted a controversial defense when they face US lawsuits Gulf
Sovereign immunity – A Pandora’s Box that must remain unopenedOften laws are in place for very good reasons. This is certainly the case regarding sovereign immunity Middle East
Gulf states voice concern over US 9/11 billHead of GCC says the law ‘contravenes the foundations and principles of relations between states, notably sovereign immunity’ Middle East
Saudi Arabia slams JASTA lawThe Saudi foreign ministry said the enactment of JASTA would contribute to the “erosion” of the principle of sovereign immunity Home Page
Could the JASTA bill lead to suing of Vietnam War veterans?The US legislation passed by the Congress on Wednesday would allow families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks to sue Saudi Arabia for damages World News
Why JASTA compresses the US view of Saudi ArabiaWhile the wording of the law does not mention Saudi Arabia, JASTA is associated in the public perception with the country Middle East
US spokesman compares Congress to school children over JASTAThe spokesman said Obama had publicly discussed the JASTA’s potential negative impact in April Middle East