How we lost faith in economic policies
Younger people tend to be especially critical of today’s economic policies, why is this?
It’s clear that people have lost confidence in economic policy – you only have to look at the dearth of new investment and the weak re-employment rates in virtually all developed economies since the financial crisis to see that.
So it’s not surprising that 10 percent of respondents to the Survey on the Global Agenda mentioned economic troubles as the most pressing emerging issue for 2014. If anything, it’s surprising the percentage wasn’t higher.
I think there are three reasons for this diminishing confidence: the reach and intensity of the crisis, the sluggish pace of recovery and the unrealistic expectations that have been placed on economic policies.
To start with the first reason, it’s important to remember that few people saw this crisis coming. People in Asia saw their businesses dropping precipitously in the fourth quarter of 2008 and had no idea who Lehman Brothers were or what they did. And it’s not just the man in the street who was caught by surprise; most experts had not anticipated the crisis because, at the time, the financial sector was seen as innovative and prosperous.
Irresponsibility and threat
It’s hard to imagine now, but the rise to record levels of home ownership in the U.S. and the growth of the subprime market were seen as signs of tremendous progress. That was flipped upside down virtually overnight, and suddenly these symbols of progress and opportunity became symbols of irresponsibility and threat.
That change was incredibly traumatic, and it has been compounded by the sluggish pace of recovery since the crisis. People are uncertain about which policies are necessary to produce a return to stronger growth, and that’s been exacerbated by the tendency to ascribe wildly unrealistic powers of healing to public policy.
Younger people tend to be especially critical of today’s economic policiesJohn Lipsky
I suspect there was an excess of belief in the short-term efficacy of policy, because it was felt that there were tools available to prevent any problem. As such, the failure of the financial system came to be seen as reflecting the failure of the regulatory environment, and the weakness of the recovery yet again suggested that policy-makers were either feckless or powerless.
Younger people tend to be especially critical of today’s economic policies – the Survey found that respondents under 50 think this issue is more significant than respondents over 50, and it’s the 18- to 29-year-olds who ascribe it the greatest significance. It makes sense that the boomers out there might not be quite so concerned personally – they stand to benefit from some very favorable government-supplied pensions, and they’ve certainly done better than previous generations in terms of public healthcare and other welfare measures. My guess is they don’t really feel like those things are at risk, whereas many younger folks in places like the U.S. will be wondering how long these systems will remain intact.
If we’re going to turn this around and rebuild confidence, we need to heed the lessons highlighted by the current crisis, and the first of those is the degree to which the global economy is interconnected. The most enlightened response to the crisis and this mutual interdependence of the global economy was the formation of the G20 leaders, but its potential has been dramatically underestimated.
The G20 existed previously at the level of finance ministers, so somehow elevating it to heads of state didn’t seem like such a big deal; but a regular meeting of the heads of government of a group representing two-thirds of the world’s population and 85 percent of its GDP has no historical precedent. The initial institutional response was extremely effective, and yet it’s been permitted to waste away. Cooperative efforts are the best way of dealing with interconnected problems, and if we can keep that in mind and build on the early successes of the G20 leaders, I think we can make a difference.
This article was first published on the World Economic Forum blog on Nov. 15, 2013.
John Lipsky is a Distinguished Visiting Scholar at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University, U.S., and Chair of the Global Agenda Council on International Monetary Systems.
- Brazil: The future energy superpower
- OECD: Growth in advanced economies stuck in Q3
- Libya’s economy to shrink by 5.1% in 2013, says IMF
- Egypt’s economy grows contrary to IMF’s view, says interim PM
- Algeria looks to industry to boost flagging economy
- IMF’s Lagarde says keen to engage with Egypt on economy
- World Bank: Israel grip on West Bank costs Palestinian economy $3.4bn
- Dubai aims to become capital of global Islamic economy
- Gulf economies to expand 4.4% in 2014, says IMF
- Reuters poll reveals gulf economies to grow in 2014 despite cheaper oil