The Doha test: A catalyst for Gulf solidarity

The Israeli airstrike on Doha earlier this month constitutes a significant escalation between Israel and Qatar, creating profound concern across the entire Arabian Peninsula. While rooted in the armed conflict in Gaza, this unprecedented breach of Qatar’s sovereignty is not an isolated incident, following up on violations of the sovereignty of a host of countries, including Syria, Lebanon and Tunisia. It constitutes a direct test of regional resolve, the durability of international political partnerships, and the fundamental principle of sovereignty. In this precarious moment, the response must be one of firm commitment to collective Gulf security, solidarity and strategic Arab diplomacy.

For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

For decades, the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have recognized that their security and prosperity are inextricably linked. This solidarity has formed the cornerstone of regional stability. The violation of any member’s territorial integrity concerns all members, challenging the collective red lines that ensure the Gulf remains a space of safety and development. Allowing external conflicts to create divisions within the GCC undermines the very security architecture that has guaranteed regional progress and stability. This is a moment to reaffirm unequivocally that the security of one is the concern of all.

This incident also serves as a critical litmus test for international relations in the region. For strategic partners, particularly the United States, whose security commitments are deeply woven into the region’s defense framework, actions that compromise allied sovereignty create troubling dissonance. The attacks against Doha test the boundaries of these relationships, probing the limits of tolerance and the clarity of mutual commitments. A unified Gulf stance represents not aggression but a necessary reaffirmation of the principles of mutual respect and sovereignty upon which durable alliances are built. It demands that these partnerships remain consistent, predictable, and anchored in international law.

This point is sharply illustrated by the performance of the Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) system. Qatar had a reasonable expectation that the IAMD system – a regionally funded, US-integrated shield designed to protect GCC airspace – would secure its skies. Operated by USCENTCOM from al-Udeid Air Base, the architecture is embedded within the US command-and-control network, ensuring in principle that no unauthorized aircraft can enter Qatari or neighboring airspace – Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates (UAE), along with Jordan – undetected.

Yet the system’s failure to respond to airspace violations over Doha starkly exposes its unreliability. This lapse – regardless of its origin – underscores the critical need for more autonomous and credible defense capabilities of GCC countries.

Amidst these tensions, addressing the root cause of regional instability – the Palestinian-Israeli conflict – becomes increasingly urgent. The cycle of violence has repeatedly proven counterproductive, spilling across borders and threatening to engulf the entire region. Gulf states have consistently led diplomatic efforts for a just two-state solution, exemplified by the mediation efforts of Qatar and the UAE’s unequivocal stance that any Israeli annexation of the West Bank constitutes a red line and that crossing it must have diplomatic, economic and political consequences.

Rooted in decades of international consensus – from countless UN resolutions adopted by the UN Security Council and UN General Assembly to the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative and the 1993 Oslo Accords – the two-state solution remains the most sustainable framework for peace. It envisions a future where Israel and an independent and viable sovereign Palestinian state coexist side-by-side in peace and security. This is not merely a political abstraction; it is a pragmatic necessity for stability, dignity, and prosperity for both peoples.

The Arab Gulf states must now employ their diplomatic weight and moral authority to advocate for an immediate ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian access to Gaza, and a return to meaningful negotiations. This builds upon the unified position recently demonstrated at the Arab-Islamic emergency summit of September 15, which presented a collective call for peace and de-escalation. Enhanced political engagement from Gulf countries, in coordination with regional and international partners, could provide the crucial forum needed to defuse tensions, restart dialogue, and reinforce the importance of adhering to international law.

The path forward requires above all GCC unity. The Council must stand united in defending non-negotiable sovereignty while engaging international partners to ensure their actions align with stated commitments to regional stability and a rules-based order. Most critically, GCC nations must redouble efforts toward the only viable foundation for lasting peace: a two-state solution that guarantees peace, security, and dignity by establishing a viable and independent Palestinian state, a goal recently reaffirmed by Western countries’ growing recognition of Palestine. The alternative to diplomatic resolution is an untenable cycle of violence that endangers the entire region’s future.

Read more:

Does the Israeli attack on Doha end Gulf-US relations?

Israel is reenacting its Holocaust in Gaza

Netanyahu has found no country willing to take Gaza’s displaced