Hezbollah’s precarious highwire: Balancing the brink of war with Israel

In the shadow of Israel’s pounding of Gaza, a more sinister scenario forms, with Lebanon’s Hezbollah looming on Israel’s north. As the IDF prepares to move to southern Gaza, the region’s eyes are fixed on Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s enigmatic leader, whose next move could ignite the powder keg of the Middle East. With an arsenal that rivals some national armies - including rockets and long-range missiles capable of striking deep inside Israel - and a history steeped in bloodshed and resistance, Hezbollah represents the possibility of a cataclysmic regional war.

For the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

Earlier this month, Nasrallah warned of the possibility of Hezbollah escalating the conflict with Israel into a full-scale war, especially as the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) intensifies its ground operations in Gaza and turns its focus to southern Gaza. With thousands fleeing southern Lebanon in anticipation of further violence, Nasrallah’s words, Hezbollah’s actions, and Israel’s response carry the weight of potential regional upheaval.

Founded in 1982, Hezbollah emerged from the chaos of Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and the broader regional conflicts involving various Palestinian militant groups. Inspired by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s radical Shia theology, Hezbollah’s formation was a response to perceived injustices and foreign interventions in Lebanon, including those of Israel.

Over the years, Iran has played a key role in supporting Hezbollah, providing training, funding, and weapons, thereby positioning it as a key player in Iran’s wider regional strategy against Israel and Western imperialism. Hezbollah now serves as a resistance.

Over the decades, Hezbollah evolved from a guerrilla group to a sophisticated organization encompassing military, political, and social dimensions crucial to understanding its current role. With a significant Shia following in Lebanon and substantial military capabilities, Hezbollah balances its revolutionary aims with the practicalities of governance and political participation. This duality is reflected in its actions and rhetoric, oscillating between militant resistance and pragmatic political maneuvering.

Now, Hezbollah is a much stronger, capable, modern military force than Hamas. A full-scale engagement by Hezbollah with the IDF could exceed the destructiveness of the 2006 conflict, given the enhanced military capabilities of both forces. Such a scenario would have profound implications for Lebanon, Israel, and the wider Middle East, underscoring the delicate balance that currently prevails.

That 2006 conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, precipitated by a cross-border raid by Hezbollah, resulted in the death of more than 1,200 Lebanese and 165 Israelis over 24 days, leaving extensive destruction in its wake. A full-scale war with Israel could jeopardize Hezbollah’s political role and its influence within the Middle East. Both Hezbollah and Israel are reluctant to engage in another large-scale conflict, acknowledging the potentially catastrophic consequences that could surpass those of the previous encounter.

Domestically, Hezbollah is remarkably unpopular among those not part of its Shia Muslim constituency. An increasing number of Lebanese citizens view the organization as intertwined with the broader political elite, whom they blame for steering Lebanon toward financial collapse. Even among Shia in Lebanon, the group’s popularity has dwindled as resentment grows over Hezbollah’s corruption and intimidation and the unstable living conditions inside the country.

A complex interplay of historical grievances, ideological commitments, military capabilities, and political considerations shapes Hezbollah’s strategic calculus in the Israel-Gaza war. Its decisions in the coming months will significantly impact the immediate regional dynamics and the long-term stability and security of the Middle East.

Meanwhile, several members of the Israeli government, including Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, advocate for a more assertive approach in responding to Hezbollah’s bombardment of Israeli military bases along the border. Gallant believes this moment represents an opportunity to address the long-running threat to Israel’s northern region definitively.

Netanyahu does not want war with Hezbollah, nor do most Israeli leaders. The IDF would be challenged to move the conflict with Hamas to northern Gaza while fighting off a significantly more capable force to its north.

While neither side wants an all-out war, a strategic miscalculation could lead to escalation. Hezbollah rockets enter Israel, and the IDF responds. Hezbollah has been involved in several skirmishes along the Israeli border, sometimes directly or through support of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ military wing, which has been active in southern Lebanon. These incidents are strategically measured to remain within certain bounds yet still maintain the possibility of a broader conflict with Israel. This precarious equilibrium is susceptible to collapse into a broader regional war, either through misjudgment or a conscious choice to change tactics.

While the ghosts of the 2006 conflict linger, haunting the collective memory of all parties involved, the potential for a renewed clash remains a stark reality. The precarious situation serves as a stark reminder of the fragile status quo that exists between periods of violence—a reminder that peace, when it does come, is often tenuous and temporary. As global powers observe and regional players hold their breath, the onus falls not only on Hezbollah and Israel but also on the international community to forge a path away from the precipice of war. The choices made today will echo through history, determining whether the next generation inherits a legacy of perpetual conflict or the foundations for enduring peace. The stakes could not be higher, and the urgency for diplomatic intervention and a return to dialogue could not be more pressing.

Joe Buccino is a retired US Army Colonel who served as the communications director for US Central Command from 2021 to September 2023.

Read more:

Hezbollah’s Nasrallah warns wider Mideast conflict is ‘realistic possibility’

Israel’s Kiryat Shmona hit by Hamas rockets fired from Lebanon

Lebanon’s Hezbollah launches drone attacks on Israeli army positions, Israel reacts